Why does it seem like every single time someone is put in the spotlight about a tangential topic they quickly display themselves as essentially limited hangout controlled opposition? Does the self-policing, bribing, blackmailing, or just Psyop influence run that deep. The Noticing will continue…
What you and Asha seem to misunderstand is that these guys are all Zionists who have stepped into our domain because the hate filled trolls have actually done more in the past 10 years to change the dynamics than anyone else. They have to address our issues and try to dial us in, hence the endless stream of grifters trying to tell us not to hate, not be anti semites, and that words in our language are just slurs and low IQ.
yes the hate filled trolls are there to blackwash and demonize honest truthseekers. if we question anything about Jewish dominance in any field, or their part in mass migration of africans and muslims into white christian countries (Barbara Lerner Specter admits their role), then we are lumped in with the worst of the worst and called tin foil hatted alex jones groupies
You misunderstand me completely. Please try to understand where I am coming from, I hope Asha does too.
When the alt right was born, tons and tons of angry young dudes entered the online discourse and immediately changed the dynamics of public opinion and thought. Their memes beat everything that came their way, and their rhetoric grew into a torrent that now has shaped political policy across the West, because without their influence there would be no rise of the far right, the dissident right, or the radical right, or whatever. Their memes, their trollish energy, their *anger* did more than all the rational truthseeking of prior activists.
I am not saying we should always be trollish. I am saying that throwing out the vast majority of pro-White dudes because they are angry and use slurs doesn't make you any more virtuous. Honestly, slur slinging racists are more likely to fight than people who get squeamish over the words nigger or kike.
One should *never* throw out any genuine and well-meaning ally merely because they use 'slurs', or speak in a more crude or abrasive way - this hints at passion or depth of feeling, which is justified, helpful, necessary - simultaneously, we have to understand that our ranks have been infiltrated by a few who speak in this most rough and offensive way precisely because they're seeking to drive away those newcomers of a more moderate bent.. the type of newcomer extremely receptive to our message, yet view yelling slurs at women or children on city streets as unfruitful/silly behavior.
Whether we like it or not, it hurts our ability to appeal to those still drifting in our direction when some intensely (and consciously, purposefully) unlikeable fellow takes on all the toxic traits and behaviors he's able to, in the most public manner.
Dishonest actors aside, even among the most genuine actors, I hope all in our ranks care more about *winning* than they do personal cathartic release.. it can feel good, in a purely personal sense, to express pure hatred in the most loud and abrasive way.. but it's not always helpful to the rest of us.
I'm far from perfect here, myself.. but before communicating anything in these spheres I try to ask myself the question 'is this broadly a net-positive, or is this me simply releasing steam?'
I think there's something of an art in effectively blending the two..
Well said. Reminds me of the open carry debate. 2A rights are the second most important issue to me, but strolling around downtown with my AK seems rude. Just because you have every right to be abrasive, doesn't mean you should. And it certainly doesn't help. A lesson the gay agenda has yet to learn.
Great points, well articulated, and I’m glad you wrote this since his comments are subscriber only and I wanted to say some similar things. I have no idea who this guy is, but I read his article and he sounds like a tool bag who’s just too cool to bloody his hands with civilizational and spiritual conflict. Maybe he could write an article directed to Zionists and ask them to be cool and lay off the anti-White hate?
“Now remember, when things look bad and it looks like you're not gonna make it, then you gotta get mean. I mean plumb, mad-dog mean. 'Cause if you lose your head and you give up then you neither live nor win. That's just the way it is.”
~The Outlaw Josey Wales
I have a theory that violence comes from unresolved anger… anger comes from unresolved frustration… frustration comes from unmet expectations and expectations come from experience and cultural programming.
I think that many of us are already at the unresolved anger stage and recognize that the probability of a peaceful resolution is accelerating to zero.
We. Are. In. A. Total. War.
When you are in a fight, anger is a fuel that can burn you to victory.
The problem is that we are split between being hard asses who don't care if we are mean, and those who think we can still convince everyone with logic and reason.
I don't think there are many left who believe we can 'convince everyone with logic and reason', and the time is certainly coming where we need to be much harder across the board.. but this doesn't need to be done in an immature or loutish way. In fact, I'd suggest it *can't* be done in this way, if it expects to succeed, and gain sufficient inertia - the more mature and stable and disciplined it is, the further it'll go.
I always go back to the difference between the SS and the SA.. the latter were largely drunken hooligans, ranks filled with several homosexuals and degenerates and addicts, and people merely looking for trouble, or seeking to get a rise out of people. The SS was an extraordinarily disciplined and refined entity, capable of *vastly* more as result.
The world best responds to serious and mature strength, the type that moves forward in total confidence because definitively certain they're fighting for the good and true and noble - not those shouting slurs from the rooftops like edgy children
There are a certain few among us who have had their brains fried by academia, and will play footsie with an adversary because of the requirement for charitable interpretation. I think you'll find what really gets to Asha is the low IQ part, not the hatred part.
This late in the game, there is no reason to steel man your opponent's position. It is just weak. Playing semantic games and insisting on "righteous indignation" risible.
Thank you for taking the time to write this. I hadn't read the article you are discussing but I listened to his Jeffery Epstein podcast. In that he describes Jewish networks of power and manipulation but then dismisses people who join the obvious dots as crackpot antisemites that he's embarrassed to introduce to others. I do wonder what's motivating him. As you say, he is insightful to a point but then fails to take the final steps.
It's frustrating how someone that can explain exactly why the Podesta emails were such a big deal doesn't make the final leap. MAYBE Epstein's pedo network was ultimately a British operation, but Israel is at the least a junior partner.
"And I’d like to end this article with a variant, to more fully paint the perceived contrast here:
If you do have strong feelings about all of this, God bless you. You’re doing it right."
- exactly so. How can one NOT have strong feelings about the ongoing destitution of our people and, by extension, the world, and because of that - look for cause/effect, and possible answers to this ongoing uglification of our world? xo
I think Cooper reveals himself as controlled opposition or limited hangout, gives some truth to snag people, and then takes them in the direction of “don’t hate or be angry against those who are out to destroy you”. So he comes along on Tucker acting like the cool guy on the edges, giving us some alternative history and gains a following, an audience only then to pivot and attempt to label those fighting for survival as selfish and motivated by anger and hate. Okay I will own that - but it’s what you do with that anger that counts. We have an absolute right to be selfish as that is self preservation, and self love! I think Cooper has been compromised. Great letter, Asha.
This was a brilliant take, and one that i share completely. These characters, like many before Daryl, need to be called out for shepherding otherwise well intentioned men away from following their own hearts, and further more their own destiny's.
That chart referring to White's as "non Jewish White" is wild. Other than Jews not being White, it's like referring to "straight people" as "non homosexual people".
Jews are not white, they are jewish, you can get a DNA test that will tell you if you are jewish. While I do admit that the word White when describing a people is inaccurate, but White means those of European non jewish ethnicity.
The Jewish definitely do not think of themselves as white and regard European whites as less than dogs. we are in their crosshairs and every single country of European non-Jewish ethnicity is being destroyed as we speak
I grew up in the 1960s/70s. We were absolutely steamrolled with Jewish culture. We heard how wonderful Israel was. And I believed it wholeheartedly. I had two very good Jewish friends (still do) and enjoyed their humor and intelligence.
It was decades before I started to realize that a vast amount of the attitudes and beliefs I lapped up from media, education, books, were hostile to my culture. A WASP myself, I had unthinkingly adopted the "WASPs bad, America bad, Europe bad, love of nation bad" mindset. And there was no counterpoint in our usual information sources. Books critical of the originators of that mindset, or which were critical of the standard narratives of WWII, or banking, or media ownership and control, were suppressed. All I knew was what I was told: that they were full of hateful ideas, written by hateful people, and it was best for society if those ideas were kept out of sight.
Only when the internet came along, did I start to catch glimpses of a different reality. And, cumulatively, they started to make sense. Over time, they made more sense than the standard-model narrative. And I started to realize that most of it originated from a foreign tribe who were hostile to my original culture and ancestry. Did that make me hate them? No. Did it make me want terrible vengeance visited on them? Also no. All I want is for my people to realize what has been done to their own history and culture. Shrugging off decades of mental programming will take effort but once minds are changed, the main work will already be done.
If I get called anti-semite for pointing out some of these malign influences, well, I can't do anything about that. I don't hate. I just want the truth to be spoken. “If it can be destroyed by the truth, it deserves to be destroyed by the truth.”
What I want is more than truth being spoken, although that’s a good start, I want this small faction behind the destruction to stop what they are doing. Great you woke up.
At the same time, getting engaged in low-IQ content (as you said), algorithms who keep you enraged and constantly frustrated and almost get you into a state of despair, don’t think it’s the solution. I took a step back from X and in that time I started to read more and use that time more productively. I’m 100% with you that these problems and the root of them needs to be adressed and not ignored, because what kind of world are we going to build for our children (this is the most powerful reason someone can feel)?
Darryl definitely recognizes that the replacement is real, and views it as huge problem. But the driving force is sadly, other (non-Jewish) white people. They should be the target of our ire, white people need to self police these weak, idiotic, and self-interested elements of our own population before we start telling other groups to clean house. You are 100% right about Epstein, Israel's influence on America sickens me. Cooper asks that important question at the end of his Epstein series, but leaves it open-ended unfortunately. I'm reading 200 Years Together right now, and it's a very fair look at Jewish involvement in the beginning of communism. I think it has many parallels to our current situation.
“…father feels such intense emotion (emotion that rarely interferes with family duties) because he’s deeply concerned over the future of his son or daughter and the increasingly sick world he’ll soon be handing off to them.”
Couldn’t be more correct here, it wasn’t until my first son was born that the simmer heated to a boil. Darryl (who incidentally blocked me for calling him a “lolbert”, not for JQ stuff) is an infuriating character. Appears ideologically aligned right up until the end when he invariably bails. I’ve learned to trust my gut with these types, and if what I feel is anger when I read them, then I know they are essentially compromised, or at least caveat emptor
Why does it seem like every single time someone is put in the spotlight about a tangential topic they quickly display themselves as essentially limited hangout controlled opposition? Does the self-policing, bribing, blackmailing, or just Psyop influence run that deep. The Noticing will continue…
What you and Asha seem to misunderstand is that these guys are all Zionists who have stepped into our domain because the hate filled trolls have actually done more in the past 10 years to change the dynamics than anyone else. They have to address our issues and try to dial us in, hence the endless stream of grifters trying to tell us not to hate, not be anti semites, and that words in our language are just slurs and low IQ.
yes the hate filled trolls are there to blackwash and demonize honest truthseekers. if we question anything about Jewish dominance in any field, or their part in mass migration of africans and muslims into white christian countries (Barbara Lerner Specter admits their role), then we are lumped in with the worst of the worst and called tin foil hatted alex jones groupies
You misunderstand me completely. Please try to understand where I am coming from, I hope Asha does too.
When the alt right was born, tons and tons of angry young dudes entered the online discourse and immediately changed the dynamics of public opinion and thought. Their memes beat everything that came their way, and their rhetoric grew into a torrent that now has shaped political policy across the West, because without their influence there would be no rise of the far right, the dissident right, or the radical right, or whatever. Their memes, their trollish energy, their *anger* did more than all the rational truthseeking of prior activists.
I am not saying we should always be trollish. I am saying that throwing out the vast majority of pro-White dudes because they are angry and use slurs doesn't make you any more virtuous. Honestly, slur slinging racists are more likely to fight than people who get squeamish over the words nigger or kike.
One should *never* throw out any genuine and well-meaning ally merely because they use 'slurs', or speak in a more crude or abrasive way - this hints at passion or depth of feeling, which is justified, helpful, necessary - simultaneously, we have to understand that our ranks have been infiltrated by a few who speak in this most rough and offensive way precisely because they're seeking to drive away those newcomers of a more moderate bent.. the type of newcomer extremely receptive to our message, yet view yelling slurs at women or children on city streets as unfruitful/silly behavior.
Whether we like it or not, it hurts our ability to appeal to those still drifting in our direction when some intensely (and consciously, purposefully) unlikeable fellow takes on all the toxic traits and behaviors he's able to, in the most public manner.
Dishonest actors aside, even among the most genuine actors, I hope all in our ranks care more about *winning* than they do personal cathartic release.. it can feel good, in a purely personal sense, to express pure hatred in the most loud and abrasive way.. but it's not always helpful to the rest of us.
I'm far from perfect here, myself.. but before communicating anything in these spheres I try to ask myself the question 'is this broadly a net-positive, or is this me simply releasing steam?'
I think there's something of an art in effectively blending the two..
Well said. Reminds me of the open carry debate. 2A rights are the second most important issue to me, but strolling around downtown with my AK seems rude. Just because you have every right to be abrasive, doesn't mean you should. And it certainly doesn't help. A lesson the gay agenda has yet to learn.
great comment. I believe in taking the high road whenever possible and conducting myself with integrity.
Agree
I've also noticed this. Jordan Peterson, Tommy Robinson, Douglas Murray to name but a few.
Murray definitely. Doesn't help he's an admitted neocon.
Great points, well articulated, and I’m glad you wrote this since his comments are subscriber only and I wanted to say some similar things. I have no idea who this guy is, but I read his article and he sounds like a tool bag who’s just too cool to bloody his hands with civilizational and spiritual conflict. Maybe he could write an article directed to Zionists and ask them to be cool and lay off the anti-White hate?
bravo!
They who don't hate where they ought to hate, will not love where they ought to love
- Edmund Burke
“Now remember, when things look bad and it looks like you're not gonna make it, then you gotta get mean. I mean plumb, mad-dog mean. 'Cause if you lose your head and you give up then you neither live nor win. That's just the way it is.”
~The Outlaw Josey Wales
I have a theory that violence comes from unresolved anger… anger comes from unresolved frustration… frustration comes from unmet expectations and expectations come from experience and cultural programming.
I think that many of us are already at the unresolved anger stage and recognize that the probability of a peaceful resolution is accelerating to zero.
We. Are. In. A. Total. War.
When you are in a fight, anger is a fuel that can burn you to victory.
The problem is that we are split between being hard asses who don't care if we are mean, and those who think we can still convince everyone with logic and reason.
I don't think there are many left who believe we can 'convince everyone with logic and reason', and the time is certainly coming where we need to be much harder across the board.. but this doesn't need to be done in an immature or loutish way. In fact, I'd suggest it *can't* be done in this way, if it expects to succeed, and gain sufficient inertia - the more mature and stable and disciplined it is, the further it'll go.
I always go back to the difference between the SS and the SA.. the latter were largely drunken hooligans, ranks filled with several homosexuals and degenerates and addicts, and people merely looking for trouble, or seeking to get a rise out of people. The SS was an extraordinarily disciplined and refined entity, capable of *vastly* more as result.
The world best responds to serious and mature strength, the type that moves forward in total confidence because definitively certain they're fighting for the good and true and noble - not those shouting slurs from the rooftops like edgy children
There are a certain few among us who have had their brains fried by academia, and will play footsie with an adversary because of the requirement for charitable interpretation. I think you'll find what really gets to Asha is the low IQ part, not the hatred part.
This late in the game, there is no reason to steel man your opponent's position. It is just weak. Playing semantic games and insisting on "righteous indignation" risible.
Thank you for taking the time to write this. I hadn't read the article you are discussing but I listened to his Jeffery Epstein podcast. In that he describes Jewish networks of power and manipulation but then dismisses people who join the obvious dots as crackpot antisemites that he's embarrassed to introduce to others. I do wonder what's motivating him. As you say, he is insightful to a point but then fails to take the final steps.
That is the textbook definition of a limited hangout.
YES YES YES! exactly what I said. Thank you.
It's like a grown elephant, who still believes that the puny chain which has restrained him since childhood is still capable of restraining his might.
cooper is a tool. anyone who appears on Tucker is controlled.
It's frustrating how someone that can explain exactly why the Podesta emails were such a big deal doesn't make the final leap. MAYBE Epstein's pedo network was ultimately a British operation, but Israel is at the least a junior partner.
"And I’d like to end this article with a variant, to more fully paint the perceived contrast here:
If you do have strong feelings about all of this, God bless you. You’re doing it right."
- exactly so. How can one NOT have strong feelings about the ongoing destitution of our people and, by extension, the world, and because of that - look for cause/effect, and possible answers to this ongoing uglification of our world? xo
well stated kindred spirit
Just learned you have a sub stack. What a banger
I think Cooper reveals himself as controlled opposition or limited hangout, gives some truth to snag people, and then takes them in the direction of “don’t hate or be angry against those who are out to destroy you”. So he comes along on Tucker acting like the cool guy on the edges, giving us some alternative history and gains a following, an audience only then to pivot and attempt to label those fighting for survival as selfish and motivated by anger and hate. Okay I will own that - but it’s what you do with that anger that counts. We have an absolute right to be selfish as that is self preservation, and self love! I think Cooper has been compromised. Great letter, Asha.
This was a brilliant take, and one that i share completely. These characters, like many before Daryl, need to be called out for shepherding otherwise well intentioned men away from following their own hearts, and further more their own destiny's.
great article, thank you. Apathy is always deadly, at any point or stage in the life of a man or a society as a whole.
That chart referring to White's as "non Jewish White" is wild. Other than Jews not being White, it's like referring to "straight people" as "non homosexual people".
"Non-homosexual Straight".
Reminds me of "Boyfriend-free girl."
Jews are not white, they are jewish, you can get a DNA test that will tell you if you are jewish. While I do admit that the word White when describing a people is inaccurate, but White means those of European non jewish ethnicity.
The Jewish definitely do not think of themselves as white and regard European whites as less than dogs. we are in their crosshairs and every single country of European non-Jewish ethnicity is being destroyed as we speak
I grew up in the 1960s/70s. We were absolutely steamrolled with Jewish culture. We heard how wonderful Israel was. And I believed it wholeheartedly. I had two very good Jewish friends (still do) and enjoyed their humor and intelligence.
It was decades before I started to realize that a vast amount of the attitudes and beliefs I lapped up from media, education, books, were hostile to my culture. A WASP myself, I had unthinkingly adopted the "WASPs bad, America bad, Europe bad, love of nation bad" mindset. And there was no counterpoint in our usual information sources. Books critical of the originators of that mindset, or which were critical of the standard narratives of WWII, or banking, or media ownership and control, were suppressed. All I knew was what I was told: that they were full of hateful ideas, written by hateful people, and it was best for society if those ideas were kept out of sight.
Only when the internet came along, did I start to catch glimpses of a different reality. And, cumulatively, they started to make sense. Over time, they made more sense than the standard-model narrative. And I started to realize that most of it originated from a foreign tribe who were hostile to my original culture and ancestry. Did that make me hate them? No. Did it make me want terrible vengeance visited on them? Also no. All I want is for my people to realize what has been done to their own history and culture. Shrugging off decades of mental programming will take effort but once minds are changed, the main work will already be done.
If I get called anti-semite for pointing out some of these malign influences, well, I can't do anything about that. I don't hate. I just want the truth to be spoken. “If it can be destroyed by the truth, it deserves to be destroyed by the truth.”
What I want is more than truth being spoken, although that’s a good start, I want this small faction behind the destruction to stop what they are doing. Great you woke up.
At the same time, getting engaged in low-IQ content (as you said), algorithms who keep you enraged and constantly frustrated and almost get you into a state of despair, don’t think it’s the solution. I took a step back from X and in that time I started to read more and use that time more productively. I’m 100% with you that these problems and the root of them needs to be adressed and not ignored, because what kind of world are we going to build for our children (this is the most powerful reason someone can feel)?
Darryl definitely recognizes that the replacement is real, and views it as huge problem. But the driving force is sadly, other (non-Jewish) white people. They should be the target of our ire, white people need to self police these weak, idiotic, and self-interested elements of our own population before we start telling other groups to clean house. You are 100% right about Epstein, Israel's influence on America sickens me. Cooper asks that important question at the end of his Epstein series, but leaves it open-ended unfortunately. I'm reading 200 Years Together right now, and it's a very fair look at Jewish involvement in the beginning of communism. I think it has many parallels to our current situation.
“…father feels such intense emotion (emotion that rarely interferes with family duties) because he’s deeply concerned over the future of his son or daughter and the increasingly sick world he’ll soon be handing off to them.”
Couldn’t be more correct here, it wasn’t until my first son was born that the simmer heated to a boil. Darryl (who incidentally blocked me for calling him a “lolbert”, not for JQ stuff) is an infuriating character. Appears ideologically aligned right up until the end when he invariably bails. I’ve learned to trust my gut with these types, and if what I feel is anger when I read them, then I know they are essentially compromised, or at least caveat emptor