Something interesting I've learnt is that serotonin, despite generally being seen as a beneficial brain chemical for socialising handling stress, actually inhibits the aggression/domination neurotransmitter Arginine Vasopressin. Vasopressin has more receptors in male brains than in female ones, and in good-natured individuals works in tandem with the social neurotransmitter Oxytocin and specific Dopamine receptors to produce a psychological phenomenon known as "defensive aggression", essentially the source of seeking justice and outrage over social injustice in society. Have you ever noticed that a lot women often shy away from the punishment of ruthless criminals, or would prefer to parley with and rehabilitate the Malmo migrant cocaine dealer and rapist than hold him accountable and lock him away or deport him for what he did to his victims? Its probably partially due to the fact they have similar oxytocin sensitivity to men of their stock, but have more dimorphic and lower density distributions of the vasopressin receptor than men on average.
A person constantly high in serotonin would have inhibited levels of vasopressin, and potentially an inhibited sense of justice as well. An unsettling and related part of the modern West is that Western countries are world leaders in consumption of Anti-Depressant SSRI drugs, which make serotonin levels in the brain higher than normal for long periods, and Western politicians are prevalent SSRI takers. Vasopressin itself can lead to psychopathic and criminal behaviours, andindeed there's evidence that Africans have aberrant mutations in Arginine Vasopressin receptor genes that are next to nonexistent in Europeans, but someone with dysfunctional vasopressin due to chronically high serotonin levels would likely not feel any sense of defensive aggression and thus have a chilled sense of social justice. A politician on SSRIs in the face of ethnic unrest, rape, tribal violence against Westerners, grooming gangs and the like would probably act as if he or she were a complete and utter zombie, unable to feel any sort of righteous anger or deep empathy for the victims or a desire to catch the perpetrators, because they'd be too comfortable in their bed of serotonin silk.
I wonder if we are thinking about this a certain kind of way. Let's put aside our beliefs or assumptions and talk about a scenario in pure factual manner. Let's say that the degeneration of a society could be measured as a function over time, as well as a society's inherent resistance to such corruption which includes those actively trying to promote a healthy society.
Now imagine the value for the degenerate forces have exceeded the values for the resistance to that trend. In effect ensuring that any effort to resist this degradation cannot succeed. A chart that would indicate the effective destruction of what good people call civilization.
I wonder if we were to apply that metric to our society what it would show. Is it possible that we have already passed the point where if we continue to struggle within the medium containing that degenerate agent we are doomed to defeat. Any effort on our part simply extending the time it will take.
When do we decide in our base reality that such a point has been reached? Or do we not even consider it because it would imply we ought to take action against that inevitability. Action that would require removing ourselves from the current game board, a process that could not be done gradually if it were to take place.
What do we do if we have passed the Rubicon? I do not know that we have, but I think there is good reason to suspect we are at least in danger of doing so. What then?
I guess I'm asking if it might not be clever to have a plan for removing ourselves from the system that no longer allows us a chance at recovering from the downward trend. Any plan might be better than nothing, as if the answer is nothing then the question becomes irrelevant.
I suspect that the causal agent of degeneration in our society has planned for this possibility. If so, then we can also assume that it is taking action to reduce its exposure to risk from that outcome. A point in time will come on that plot chart that will indicate where it is no longer possible to leave the system, ever.
It's a dark thought. It leads us to consider if we are already defeated and are simply still unaware of that fact. If this is the case, and it's too late to even decouple from the system, do we simply continue to struggle, or do we accept that by having agreed to play the game we ensured we would lose?
Is the noble course of action to practice the values that must have been defective?
To my eyes there doesn't appear to be any kind of plan for an alternative outcome. Hmm.
Believe me when I say that there's never been a time in human history where conditions like ours weren't salvageable or reversable. Sardinians, pure Neolithic Farmers, survived the entire conquest of their race from the North to the South of Europe by the Indo-Europeans, on their island and on neighbouring Corsica, and they have retained the Neolithic Old European genetic signal ever since, staying racially consistent over 8000 years.
Tajiks and Pashtuns, despite invasions by Mongol rapists who treated them as second class and the source of tithes and abductable war brides retain their Iron-Age Iranian genetic characters, sometimes even recapitulating throwback phenotypes to their Nordic Aryan ancestors.
Korea sweltered under the Japanese yoke and seemed doomed to be assimilated, and now they are one of the most developed nations on earth with soft power through Korean media in every Western household.
The Christians of Iberia were totally broken by the betrayals at Toledo and the Moor invaders, but slowly, from small kingdoms in the Pyrenees, they reconquered Al-Andalus for Europe and Christendom, and genetically completely replaced the North African element with the Castilian and other Spaniard ancestral elements who had even more North European admixture than Roman Iberia.
Baltic Estonian Lithuanian and Latvian peasants lived under the boot of German landowners, Polish Szlachta and usurious (((tribesmen))) for 100s of years, kept illiterate with less rights than livestock. Now, Estonia has one of the highest IQ averages, academic performances, average standing heights, academic performances by top 5% students and scientific literacy in Europe, with Lithuania and Latvia catching up.
And the modern West is absolutely nowhere near as in danger as any of these people were. Despite large non-White populations, we still make the majority of the population in every Western nation, we are far more educated, far more aware of racial differences, far more aware of the consequences of diversity and far more aware of the hostility the rest of the world holds for us than any generation that came before us. And we're communicating with each other, internationally, all of the descendants of White Western stock and Western Civilisation, and we can hear the cries of ethnic nepotism and crooked immigration policy mirrored in Australia, America, Canada, Spain, Portugal, France, Germany, Italy, Austria, England, Ireland, Scotland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Hungary and New Zealand, as well as the demands for deportations.
We're not even remotely past the point of no return and will never get there before a massive awakening and backlash rocks the West.
I agree with you completely. I suppose it's become obvious to me that the Western Civilization and it's stewards are so very unusual for its tendency to demonstrate a guilt and collective shame for its encounters with other society's, that would not be reciprocated if the tables were turned.
Is that our weakness? Or is it our way of justifying the things we will be driven to do when we can no longer tolerate the abuse?
It seems obvious that other tribes see that we are dissociated and amnesiac. Furthermore it's obvious that they are interested in attempting a stress test on our ability to endure humiliation. I suspect in order to provoke our inevitable response prematurely, so as to avoid the worst case scenario.
This is embarrassing. Might we be a failed path, who's loss of honor should have been enough to allow our downfall, but for the serendipitous development of our weapons technology. Maybe we have made ourselves invulnerable to the forces which ought to see our extinction. Idk.
Optimistic, which is refreshing. As a Canadian, I can't see it. My country seems not only too far gone, but too indoctrinated to ever tip the scale. I hope you are right.
It's not only unhealthy but historically unfeasible to think in this sort of pessimism. Canadians aren't like Mongols a dwindling elite of a land empire composed of foreign people of far greater number than them, they're the majority of the population. If you've read anything into the history of Black Propaganda you'd know that this attitude of low morale and pre-concession is exactly what hostile military powers attempt to encourage in a population in order to "defeat the enemy without engaging in direct combat" - a staple of Sun Tzu and how the allied propaganda worked in Nazi Germany, the British propaganda worked amongst Southeast Asian communists, and US propaganda worked in Afghanistan
Something interesting I've learnt is that serotonin, despite generally being seen as a beneficial brain chemical for socialising handling stress, actually inhibits the aggression/domination neurotransmitter Arginine Vasopressin. Vasopressin has more receptors in male brains than in female ones, and in good-natured individuals works in tandem with the social neurotransmitter Oxytocin and specific Dopamine receptors to produce a psychological phenomenon known as "defensive aggression", essentially the source of seeking justice and outrage over social injustice in society. Have you ever noticed that a lot women often shy away from the punishment of ruthless criminals, or would prefer to parley with and rehabilitate the Malmo migrant cocaine dealer and rapist than hold him accountable and lock him away or deport him for what he did to his victims? Its probably partially due to the fact they have similar oxytocin sensitivity to men of their stock, but have more dimorphic and lower density distributions of the vasopressin receptor than men on average.
A person constantly high in serotonin would have inhibited levels of vasopressin, and potentially an inhibited sense of justice as well. An unsettling and related part of the modern West is that Western countries are world leaders in consumption of Anti-Depressant SSRI drugs, which make serotonin levels in the brain higher than normal for long periods, and Western politicians are prevalent SSRI takers. Vasopressin itself can lead to psychopathic and criminal behaviours, andindeed there's evidence that Africans have aberrant mutations in Arginine Vasopressin receptor genes that are next to nonexistent in Europeans, but someone with dysfunctional vasopressin due to chronically high serotonin levels would likely not feel any sense of defensive aggression and thus have a chilled sense of social justice. A politician on SSRIs in the face of ethnic unrest, rape, tribal violence against Westerners, grooming gangs and the like would probably act as if he or she were a complete and utter zombie, unable to feel any sort of righteous anger or deep empathy for the victims or a desire to catch the perpetrators, because they'd be too comfortable in their bed of serotonin silk.
I wonder if we are thinking about this a certain kind of way. Let's put aside our beliefs or assumptions and talk about a scenario in pure factual manner. Let's say that the degeneration of a society could be measured as a function over time, as well as a society's inherent resistance to such corruption which includes those actively trying to promote a healthy society.
Now imagine the value for the degenerate forces have exceeded the values for the resistance to that trend. In effect ensuring that any effort to resist this degradation cannot succeed. A chart that would indicate the effective destruction of what good people call civilization.
I wonder if we were to apply that metric to our society what it would show. Is it possible that we have already passed the point where if we continue to struggle within the medium containing that degenerate agent we are doomed to defeat. Any effort on our part simply extending the time it will take.
When do we decide in our base reality that such a point has been reached? Or do we not even consider it because it would imply we ought to take action against that inevitability. Action that would require removing ourselves from the current game board, a process that could not be done gradually if it were to take place.
What do we do if we have passed the Rubicon? I do not know that we have, but I think there is good reason to suspect we are at least in danger of doing so. What then?
I guess I'm asking if it might not be clever to have a plan for removing ourselves from the system that no longer allows us a chance at recovering from the downward trend. Any plan might be better than nothing, as if the answer is nothing then the question becomes irrelevant.
I suspect that the causal agent of degeneration in our society has planned for this possibility. If so, then we can also assume that it is taking action to reduce its exposure to risk from that outcome. A point in time will come on that plot chart that will indicate where it is no longer possible to leave the system, ever.
It's a dark thought. It leads us to consider if we are already defeated and are simply still unaware of that fact. If this is the case, and it's too late to even decouple from the system, do we simply continue to struggle, or do we accept that by having agreed to play the game we ensured we would lose?
Is the noble course of action to practice the values that must have been defective?
To my eyes there doesn't appear to be any kind of plan for an alternative outcome. Hmm.
Believe me when I say that there's never been a time in human history where conditions like ours weren't salvageable or reversable. Sardinians, pure Neolithic Farmers, survived the entire conquest of their race from the North to the South of Europe by the Indo-Europeans, on their island and on neighbouring Corsica, and they have retained the Neolithic Old European genetic signal ever since, staying racially consistent over 8000 years.
Tajiks and Pashtuns, despite invasions by Mongol rapists who treated them as second class and the source of tithes and abductable war brides retain their Iron-Age Iranian genetic characters, sometimes even recapitulating throwback phenotypes to their Nordic Aryan ancestors.
Korea sweltered under the Japanese yoke and seemed doomed to be assimilated, and now they are one of the most developed nations on earth with soft power through Korean media in every Western household.
The Christians of Iberia were totally broken by the betrayals at Toledo and the Moor invaders, but slowly, from small kingdoms in the Pyrenees, they reconquered Al-Andalus for Europe and Christendom, and genetically completely replaced the North African element with the Castilian and other Spaniard ancestral elements who had even more North European admixture than Roman Iberia.
Baltic Estonian Lithuanian and Latvian peasants lived under the boot of German landowners, Polish Szlachta and usurious (((tribesmen))) for 100s of years, kept illiterate with less rights than livestock. Now, Estonia has one of the highest IQ averages, academic performances, average standing heights, academic performances by top 5% students and scientific literacy in Europe, with Lithuania and Latvia catching up.
And the modern West is absolutely nowhere near as in danger as any of these people were. Despite large non-White populations, we still make the majority of the population in every Western nation, we are far more educated, far more aware of racial differences, far more aware of the consequences of diversity and far more aware of the hostility the rest of the world holds for us than any generation that came before us. And we're communicating with each other, internationally, all of the descendants of White Western stock and Western Civilisation, and we can hear the cries of ethnic nepotism and crooked immigration policy mirrored in Australia, America, Canada, Spain, Portugal, France, Germany, Italy, Austria, England, Ireland, Scotland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Hungary and New Zealand, as well as the demands for deportations.
We're not even remotely past the point of no return and will never get there before a massive awakening and backlash rocks the West.
I agree with you completely. I suppose it's become obvious to me that the Western Civilization and it's stewards are so very unusual for its tendency to demonstrate a guilt and collective shame for its encounters with other society's, that would not be reciprocated if the tables were turned.
Is that our weakness? Or is it our way of justifying the things we will be driven to do when we can no longer tolerate the abuse?
It seems obvious that other tribes see that we are dissociated and amnesiac. Furthermore it's obvious that they are interested in attempting a stress test on our ability to endure humiliation. I suspect in order to provoke our inevitable response prematurely, so as to avoid the worst case scenario.
This is embarrassing. Might we be a failed path, who's loss of honor should have been enough to allow our downfall, but for the serendipitous development of our weapons technology. Maybe we have made ourselves invulnerable to the forces which ought to see our extinction. Idk.
Optimistic, which is refreshing. As a Canadian, I can't see it. My country seems not only too far gone, but too indoctrinated to ever tip the scale. I hope you are right.
It's not only unhealthy but historically unfeasible to think in this sort of pessimism. Canadians aren't like Mongols a dwindling elite of a land empire composed of foreign people of far greater number than them, they're the majority of the population. If you've read anything into the history of Black Propaganda you'd know that this attitude of low morale and pre-concession is exactly what hostile military powers attempt to encourage in a population in order to "defeat the enemy without engaging in direct combat" - a staple of Sun Tzu and how the allied propaganda worked in Nazi Germany, the British propaganda worked amongst Southeast Asian communists, and US propaganda worked in Afghanistan
You know, I think again about this subject, and I realize that we all find our way into the depths of eternity...
So we go down with the ship. And we consider ourselves fortunate to have the honor to do so.
That's what a Kassite would do.