I think the truth of Charlie is far less important than the hay we can make out of his death. I had him marked as a 'virgin birth influencer,' who rises from obscurity on a pile of jewish money. Which in hindsight was correct, but he didn't seem to know the price of all that 'free' money and publicity. Or maybe he did, and courageously chose to go against it.
Whatever the truth was, he is our Horst Wessel now.
They may or may not be physically dead, but the characters they were playing on the stage of life are now gone. The impact on the psyche is the death of the character, not the death of the actor.
There is no "Charlie Kirk", only a Mossad created Hero for the dull masses. How could anyone who is truly conscious buy into another psychological operation? After what the media has done to those who tried to dispel the myth of 11 hijackers taking out the twin towers ( did everyone forget how the dissenters were treated by the MSM?? ) ,or those who were injured by the clot shot, why would anyone believe anything from these wicked amplifiers? How could anyone FORGET that psychological operation of lethal injection!? The MSM has 0 credibility.
Now you want me to feel compassion for a ficitonal character that is honored more than the fallen soldiers of every war ( my Son included ) or the USS Liberty victims of the Israeli attack of 1967, who have been trying to get a hearing in Congress for 50 years!? Get the hell out of here.
Carl Jung was right. It is EXHAUSTING being in the same crowd of the unconscious. In order to preserve truth it is imperative that the Conscious remove themselves from such darkness.
Excellent, nuanced points. Charlie Kirk did indeed seem to be evolving, moving ever toward a dissident point of view. But was it sincere, or were there ulterior motives? We'll never know.
Regarding the Charlotte light-rail horror: I live not too far from there and have watched in disbelief, pretty much in real time, as Charlotte turns into Baltimore. None of the forces in play are accidental or coincidental. That "random" murder was entirely programmatic. The usual suspects want us to believe that "shit happens," and for a long time I did buy their nonsense, but it most assuredly does not just happen. More of us are waking up.
Dear Asha, thank you for your thoughtful meditation on these appalling events and for avoiding the speculation that has poisoned Twittex.
One of the symptoms of the decline of our societies from high-trust ethnostates, to low-trust dystopias, is the prevalence of CCTV and Irina is only the latest victim to display terror in her final moments, as a monster takes her life.
Charlie's end was not so brutal, as he knew nothing of the bullet that took him away. What I find astonishing is not just the tragedy but the fact he died in the moment of conducting Logos with an audience. They seemed to be fairly supportive but many times he engaged with hostile mobs and still attempted to reason with them.
Even though we might disagree with his politics, we should love him for the method he chose to change the world around him. He did fraternise with influencers and power brokers but unlike most of them, always returned to the trenches, to interact with the public.
He showed wisdom not to bury misguided kids with slabs of rhetoric and there was sometimes a spark of acknowledgment, that might later lead to salvation. This is a gift that all great teachers have; to listen and inspire. That's the challenge he left us.
There has been a tangible shift in the days since Iryna's murder and Charlie's assassination. A lot of people have realized they can't and shouldn't be silent, and are choosing to speak out and take action against the cancer within our nations. I'm seeing a lot less people blind themselves to the stark differences between races, the downright evil degeneracy of brainwashed left-wingers, and the softness of right-wingers who seem all too willing to roll over and die instead of ever fighting back--all in the name of moral superiority.
We have a long list of battles to fight, but those who are willing to fight are stronger than those who stand against us. It's going to take a will of steel and fire to overcome this, and we must never forget what we're up against. We must never soften, let our guard down, or downplay the evil we face.
Thank you for speaking about this, Asha. Thank you for all of your work. You woke me up 7 years ago. Keep fighting the good fight.
There is a serious race problem in the US and throughout Western civilization. It's long past time to call a spade a spade and for all to admit that blacks are a problem. Don't sugarcoat it or allude to it with frilly sentences. Call it what it is.
First of All, Charlie Kirk didn’t “come around.” Was he a more polished speaker who could debate better? Of course—that’s what practice does to someone. And he was already as good as most anyone as an 18- or 19-year-old kid. But to say He was evolving, and that his views were changing “people can change or evolve in life” is bullshit. Nothing CK discussed or debated from 2012 to 2020 was any different from his convictions or truths on the day he died. It seems like that’s the picture you’re trying to paint of him, and your X responses have several people agreeing with you or saying the same thing. He didn’t practice hate in 2012, and he didn’t “come around” today to become a nicer guy. He was always a kind and loving person, with none of the character flaws—like being racist, homophobic, or xenophobic—that the left-wing nutjobs have smeared him with. And it’s not a handful of far-lefty ghouls that celebrated his death. Unless you think thousands is a handful. Look at the number of social media posts that have been submitted to a website that is trying to get these animals that celebrated his death fired for. It’s not a handful; it’s many thousands of fucktards who gleefully celebrated his death, and some even called for others whose speech they didn’t like to be unalive.
Second point: If anyone needs to come around to a new way of thinking, it’s you, Asha. So I have a suggestion: If you really believe what you preach and think it’s virtuous to admit when you’re wrong, apologize, and adjust your belief system, try that approach with the Gaza-Israeli war. Take the stance that you’re wrong, Israel is right, and everything Netanyahu has said—along with everything every war hawk in Israel has said about Hamas and Gaza—is correct. Try assuming they’re right and you’re wrong, and see where that leads you.
The core idea is to approach your own convictions with skepticism: instead of seeking only evidence that supports what you already believe (which is our natural tendency), you flip the script and actively try to prove yourself wrong.
What if the opposite is true? What evidence would disprove me? What flaws or counterarguments am I ignoring?
Karl Popper (philosopher of science): He argued that true scientific progress comes from trying to falsify theories, not just confirm them. A belief isn’t robust until you’ve failed to disprove it.
Richard Feynman (physicist): He emphasized not fooling yourself by rigorously questioning your own ideas, saying, “The easiest person to fool is yourself.”
I believe once you do this, you won’t come to the conclusions you have come to about people like Douglas Murray, Jordan Peterson, Peter Hitchens, and Sam Harris, all people that leftists label and smear as Islamophobes.
We may never find out the truth of Charlie's life and death, as the present circumstances do not allow us to, just like in the case of so many figures whose ends came at the tail end of a crisis. We must make peace with that fact and judge those who are still here on standards that we wished we would've held for the dead.
I’ve been meaning to write something about this 2-for-one psyop bundle… thanks for making the propaganda visually obvious,one more time! A screenshot of this post will go into my stack of examples. :)
This is disrespectful on so many levels. You’re making this into a “racial” issue, completely devalidating the truly evil intention with which the murderers had killed. Moral character is not biological, it is a conscious action.
I think the truth of Charlie is far less important than the hay we can make out of his death. I had him marked as a 'virgin birth influencer,' who rises from obscurity on a pile of jewish money. Which in hindsight was correct, but he didn't seem to know the price of all that 'free' money and publicity. Or maybe he did, and courageously chose to go against it.
Whatever the truth was, he is our Horst Wessel now.
As far as my research has shown, both incidents' scream, "Physop!" and neither of these two are actually deceased.
Too many reasons to list, and even more independent channels reporting the truth with so many evidences it requires a thesis!
They may or may not be physically dead, but the characters they were playing on the stage of life are now gone. The impact on the psyche is the death of the character, not the death of the actor.
Turn. the. Tell. A. Vision. OFF!
You could try presenting a few, instead of just stating it's the case with zero substantiation.
There is no "Charlie Kirk", only a Mossad created Hero for the dull masses. How could anyone who is truly conscious buy into another psychological operation? After what the media has done to those who tried to dispel the myth of 11 hijackers taking out the twin towers ( did everyone forget how the dissenters were treated by the MSM?? ) ,or those who were injured by the clot shot, why would anyone believe anything from these wicked amplifiers? How could anyone FORGET that psychological operation of lethal injection!? The MSM has 0 credibility.
Now you want me to feel compassion for a ficitonal character that is honored more than the fallen soldiers of every war ( my Son included ) or the USS Liberty victims of the Israeli attack of 1967, who have been trying to get a hearing in Congress for 50 years!? Get the hell out of here.
Carl Jung was right. It is EXHAUSTING being in the same crowd of the unconscious. In order to preserve truth it is imperative that the Conscious remove themselves from such darkness.
I'm out.
Thank you Asha for a thorough, thoughtful, and beautiful piece of writing. I needed to read this. God bless you and keep you!
Excellent, nuanced points. Charlie Kirk did indeed seem to be evolving, moving ever toward a dissident point of view. But was it sincere, or were there ulterior motives? We'll never know.
Regarding the Charlotte light-rail horror: I live not too far from there and have watched in disbelief, pretty much in real time, as Charlotte turns into Baltimore. None of the forces in play are accidental or coincidental. That "random" murder was entirely programmatic. The usual suspects want us to believe that "shit happens," and for a long time I did buy their nonsense, but it most assuredly does not just happen. More of us are waking up.
Dear Asha, thank you for your thoughtful meditation on these appalling events and for avoiding the speculation that has poisoned Twittex.
One of the symptoms of the decline of our societies from high-trust ethnostates, to low-trust dystopias, is the prevalence of CCTV and Irina is only the latest victim to display terror in her final moments, as a monster takes her life.
Charlie's end was not so brutal, as he knew nothing of the bullet that took him away. What I find astonishing is not just the tragedy but the fact he died in the moment of conducting Logos with an audience. They seemed to be fairly supportive but many times he engaged with hostile mobs and still attempted to reason with them.
Even though we might disagree with his politics, we should love him for the method he chose to change the world around him. He did fraternise with influencers and power brokers but unlike most of them, always returned to the trenches, to interact with the public.
He showed wisdom not to bury misguided kids with slabs of rhetoric and there was sometimes a spark of acknowledgment, that might later lead to salvation. This is a gift that all great teachers have; to listen and inspire. That's the challenge he left us.
There has been a tangible shift in the days since Iryna's murder and Charlie's assassination. A lot of people have realized they can't and shouldn't be silent, and are choosing to speak out and take action against the cancer within our nations. I'm seeing a lot less people blind themselves to the stark differences between races, the downright evil degeneracy of brainwashed left-wingers, and the softness of right-wingers who seem all too willing to roll over and die instead of ever fighting back--all in the name of moral superiority.
We have a long list of battles to fight, but those who are willing to fight are stronger than those who stand against us. It's going to take a will of steel and fire to overcome this, and we must never forget what we're up against. We must never soften, let our guard down, or downplay the evil we face.
Thank you for speaking about this, Asha. Thank you for all of your work. You woke me up 7 years ago. Keep fighting the good fight.
There is a serious race problem in the US and throughout Western civilization. It's long past time to call a spade a spade and for all to admit that blacks are a problem. Don't sugarcoat it or allude to it with frilly sentences. Call it what it is.
First of All, Charlie Kirk didn’t “come around.” Was he a more polished speaker who could debate better? Of course—that’s what practice does to someone. And he was already as good as most anyone as an 18- or 19-year-old kid. But to say He was evolving, and that his views were changing “people can change or evolve in life” is bullshit. Nothing CK discussed or debated from 2012 to 2020 was any different from his convictions or truths on the day he died. It seems like that’s the picture you’re trying to paint of him, and your X responses have several people agreeing with you or saying the same thing. He didn’t practice hate in 2012, and he didn’t “come around” today to become a nicer guy. He was always a kind and loving person, with none of the character flaws—like being racist, homophobic, or xenophobic—that the left-wing nutjobs have smeared him with. And it’s not a handful of far-lefty ghouls that celebrated his death. Unless you think thousands is a handful. Look at the number of social media posts that have been submitted to a website that is trying to get these animals that celebrated his death fired for. It’s not a handful; it’s many thousands of fucktards who gleefully celebrated his death, and some even called for others whose speech they didn’t like to be unalive.
Second point: If anyone needs to come around to a new way of thinking, it’s you, Asha. So I have a suggestion: If you really believe what you preach and think it’s virtuous to admit when you’re wrong, apologize, and adjust your belief system, try that approach with the Gaza-Israeli war. Take the stance that you’re wrong, Israel is right, and everything Netanyahu has said—along with everything every war hawk in Israel has said about Hamas and Gaza—is correct. Try assuming they’re right and you’re wrong, and see where that leads you.
The core idea is to approach your own convictions with skepticism: instead of seeking only evidence that supports what you already believe (which is our natural tendency), you flip the script and actively try to prove yourself wrong.
What if the opposite is true? What evidence would disprove me? What flaws or counterarguments am I ignoring?
Karl Popper (philosopher of science): He argued that true scientific progress comes from trying to falsify theories, not just confirm them. A belief isn’t robust until you’ve failed to disprove it.
Richard Feynman (physicist): He emphasized not fooling yourself by rigorously questioning your own ideas, saying, “The easiest person to fool is yourself.”
I believe once you do this, you won’t come to the conclusions you have come to about people like Douglas Murray, Jordan Peterson, Peter Hitchens, and Sam Harris, all people that leftists label and smear as Islamophobes.
We may never find out the truth of Charlie's life and death, as the present circumstances do not allow us to, just like in the case of so many figures whose ends came at the tail end of a crisis. We must make peace with that fact and judge those who are still here on standards that we wished we would've held for the dead.
Both can be connected by the division of Americans into Back / White Christian / Lucifarians .The Black Nobility want such division .
Well-said, fren.
https://substack.com/@seventhearchivist/p-180976117
https://substack.com/@seventhearchivist/p-176294675
I’ve been meaning to write something about this 2-for-one psyop bundle… thanks for making the propaganda visually obvious,one more time! A screenshot of this post will go into my stack of examples. :)
This is disrespectful on so many levels. You’re making this into a “racial” issue, completely devalidating the truly evil intention with which the murderers had killed. Moral character is not biological, it is a conscious action.